UAB

3–3 · Amer · 2–3 in rated games
#111
-1.67
Compare →
Projected finish
5.1–6.9 expected
0% playoff
2% conf title game
0% first-round bye
5%
3–9
26%
4–8
37%
5–7
23%
6–6
7%
7–5
1%
8–4
<1%
9–3
bowl eligible 32% · win out <1%
Upcoming — tap a game to see what it moves
W7vs #84 East Carolina East Carolinastakes 10
31%
What this game moves
PlayoffConf title game
if UABif ECUif UABif ECU
East Carolina——8%28%
UAB——4%<1%
UTSA——45%39%
North Texas——34%29%
W9@ #70 South Florida South Floridastakes 3
18%
W10vs #136 Charlotte Charlottestakes 0
81%
W11@ #116 Temple Templestakes 3
33%
W12vs #47 UTSA UTSAstakes 16
26%
W13@ #55 North Texas North Texasstakes 9
17%
The receipts
WkOpponentResultPerfStrTot±
—Model prior · 25% weight−0.15
W1@ #66 Illinois IllinoisL 23–42321625−0.58
W2vs #133 UL Monroe UL MonroeW 26–20286344−0.07
W3@ #83 Louisiana LouisianaL 14–2140827−0.57
W4vs #93 Navy NavyW 24–20486959+0.24
W5vs Samford · not ratedW 33–14———0.00
W6@ #37 Memphis MemphisL 13–38322027−0.54
Season total✓ receipts = résumé score-1.67
Factor profile
Rush offPass offRush defPass def
Rush offense
1404 #102
Pass offense
1193 #136
Rush defense
1399 #101
Pass defense
1643 #21

Who this team is — style, not standing. These don't feed the rankings. The radar shows where each unit sits nationally.

Résumé profile
Résumé score
-1.67 #111
Elo
1308 #116
WAB
-2.0 #102
SOS
1435 #104

What the season has earned — the board's four metrics. The receipts itemize the score game by game.

Trajectory
#109#119#129W1W3W5W6
Compare →